September 21, 2009 - The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) today hosted a Residential Real Estate Appraisal Summit with federal regulatory agencies and the major housing and financial institution stakeholder and appraisal organizations to discuss constructive solutions to appraisal problems.
Among the problems discussed at the summit was the use by some appraisers of foreclosed or other distressed properties as comparables without proper adjustments. Summit participants also addressed unintended consequences from the implementation of the Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC) which are impeding the ability to obtain appraisals of the quality required in today’s distressed markets.
These inappropriate practices, including reports that some appraisers are working in areas where they don’t know the market, are driving down home values and impacting home sales as inaccurate appraisals are coming in below the contract sales price. This is causing unwarranted downward pressure on home prices at a time when housing and the economy are struggling to emerge from the worst downturn in decades.
Following the meeting, the leadership of NAHB, the National Association of REALTORS® and the Mortgage Bankers Association were united in calling for immediate action to address their appraisal-related concerns, including clarifications with regard to the HVCC and the establishment of “best practices” for the appraisal process. The groups also urged the regulators to adopt and enforce clear, concise regulatory guidance on the use of distressed and/or foreclosed properties that will allow appraisers to develop realistic valuations based on sales that are truly comparable.
“Appraisers generally are only required to inspect the exterior of a property that is being used as a comparable because they are normally unable to enter these homes and examine their interiors,” said NAHB Chairman Joe Robson, a home builder from Tulsa, Okla. “But all too often, properties that have been subject to foreclosure or distress sales have issues related to deferred maintenance or internal damage that an external inspection simply cannot detect. You can’t compare these properties to new homes that are in market-ready condition.
NAHB believes that it’s time for appraisers to have regulatory guidelines that acknowledge such realities.”
“NAR supports the independence of appraisers and the integrity of the appraisal process,” said NAR President Charles McMillan. “An accurate appraisal is an important part of any real estate transaction, and reforming the appraisal process is critical to the nation’s housing recovery.
Quality appraisals are threatened by unintended HVCC consequences and an inconsistency among the various federal regulators. As the leading advocate for housing issues, NAR calls on the federal government to establish consistent appraisal rules for FHA and the GSEs.”
“Ensuring that appraisals are fair and accurate is the lynchpin of our secured lending system,” said Robert E. Story, Jr., CMB, Incoming Chairman of the Mortgage Bankers Association. “As a lender, it is crucial that I can count on the fact that an appraisal is correct and that the appraiser has not been subject to pressure from any interested party to the transaction. We want to work with appraisers and regulators to ensure that every appraisal results in an honest, truthful evaluation of a property’s value.”
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
FHA Taking Steps to Ensure Taxpayers Money during Housing Crisis
Washington, September 18, 2009
The following is a statement by National Association of Realtors® President Charles McMillan:
“The Federal Housing Administration is playing a crucial role in providing mortgage financing to the housing market, as mortgage and banking systems have faced collapse. While FHA’s capital reserve ratio has declined, that is not surprising for an agency dealing in housing finance in today’s market, and there is no sign that a taxpayer bail-out will be required. FHA stands in contrast to entities in the private sector, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and many large banks that have needed tens of billions of dollars in federal funds.
“Under the leadership of Commissioner Dave Stevens, FHA has announced timely steps to protect taxpayers: implementing credit policy changes to enhance risk management; hiring a chief risk officer for the first time in the agency’s history; shifting responsibility for mortgage brokers away from taxpayers to the lenders who use mortgage brokers; and modifying appraisal requirements including emphasizing appraiser independence and geographic competence.
“Declining home prices have forced many homeowners into underwater positions, regardless of lender or loan product. FHA is still solvent, has significant reserves and remains an essential tool for consumers.”
The following is a statement by National Association of Realtors® President Charles McMillan:
“The Federal Housing Administration is playing a crucial role in providing mortgage financing to the housing market, as mortgage and banking systems have faced collapse. While FHA’s capital reserve ratio has declined, that is not surprising for an agency dealing in housing finance in today’s market, and there is no sign that a taxpayer bail-out will be required. FHA stands in contrast to entities in the private sector, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and many large banks that have needed tens of billions of dollars in federal funds.
“Under the leadership of Commissioner Dave Stevens, FHA has announced timely steps to protect taxpayers: implementing credit policy changes to enhance risk management; hiring a chief risk officer for the first time in the agency’s history; shifting responsibility for mortgage brokers away from taxpayers to the lenders who use mortgage brokers; and modifying appraisal requirements including emphasizing appraiser independence and geographic competence.
“Declining home prices have forced many homeowners into underwater positions, regardless of lender or loan product. FHA is still solvent, has significant reserves and remains an essential tool for consumers.”
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Credit Crunch Constrains International Home Buyers in U.S. Market
Interest in U.S. real estate by international buyers declined due to the worldwide recession and severe credit crunch, according to the 2009 National Association of Realtors® Profile of International Home Buying Activity.
The share of Realtor® clientele who are foreign buyers is smaller than in previous years, but among those purchasing nearly half paid all cash – bypassing the mortgage process. Twenty-three percent of survey respondents served at least one international client in the 12-month period between the end of May 2008 and the end of May 2009, down from 26 percent in the 2008 study. During this period an estimated 154,000 homes were sold to foreign nationals, which is down from approximately 170,000 international transactions during the previous 12 months.
The median price for a home paid by foreign buyers for the year ending in May 2009 was $247,100, higher than the overall national price of $198,100 in 2008. A significant number, 45.8 percent of foreign buyers, paid cash for their property, in part because obtaining a mortgage was more difficult than in prior years. The total dollar volume was $38.7 billion.
Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said recent improvements in the credit market will help reverse the slide in foreign buyers. “Stock market gains and improving bank balance sheets will permit a greater amount of lending for second home purchases,” he said. “In addition, expanding foreign economies for international buyers and favorable exchange rates give them more purchasing power, particularly in a period of record high affordability conditions in the United States. Property investment here generally builds wealth over the long term.”
U.S. laws do not restrict or scrutinize most property purchases by foreign nationals. There are few barriers to owning property here, unlike transactions in many other countries, although immigration laws prohibit foreigners from remaining in the U.S. continuously for more than six months without a special visa. In addition, international investors are afforded the same property rights as those enjoyed by U.S. citizens.
The top five countries of origin for foreign buyers were Canada, with 17.6 percent of buyers; the United Kingdom, 10.5 percent; Mexico, 9.8 percent; India, 8.5 percent; and China, 5.4 percent. The percentage of buyers from Canada, the U.K. and China declined from the previous study, while purchasers from Mexico and India increased.
Although most buyers were from North America, Europe and Asia, buyers from Latin America, Africa and Oceania also purchased U.S. real estate.
Foreign buyers were active in every state and the District of Columbia, with the most popular states being Florida, which accounted for 23.0 percent of all foreign purchases; California, 13.0 percent; Texas, 10.7 percent; and Arizona, 7.1 percent. These states are major gateways into the U.S. from other countries and also offer relatively mild climate.
California saw a notable rise in foreign interest as affordability conditions improved markedly in the state last year. “Florida is the most popular state for European and Latin American buyers, while Asian buyers are drawn to California,” Yun said.
The study shows 69 percent of international purchases were single-family homes, while condos accounted for 18 percent. Townhomes made up 8 percent of transactions, with commercial property at 4 percent. Nearly 46 percent of properties were in suburban areas and 25 percent in urban environments. The rest were evenly split between resorts and small towns or rural areas.
The prime purpose for purchasing a property in the U.S. is to use it for a vacation home, cited by 33.9 percent of respondents; for both investment and vacations, 23.5 percent; as a residential rental property for investment, 18.3 percent; and commercial property for investment, 3.5 percent.
The 2009 NAR Profile of International Home Buying Activity is based on responses from 3,785 Realtors® and describes international home buying activity in the U.S. over the 12-month period from the end of May 2008 to May 2009.
The share of Realtor® clientele who are foreign buyers is smaller than in previous years, but among those purchasing nearly half paid all cash – bypassing the mortgage process. Twenty-three percent of survey respondents served at least one international client in the 12-month period between the end of May 2008 and the end of May 2009, down from 26 percent in the 2008 study. During this period an estimated 154,000 homes were sold to foreign nationals, which is down from approximately 170,000 international transactions during the previous 12 months.
The median price for a home paid by foreign buyers for the year ending in May 2009 was $247,100, higher than the overall national price of $198,100 in 2008. A significant number, 45.8 percent of foreign buyers, paid cash for their property, in part because obtaining a mortgage was more difficult than in prior years. The total dollar volume was $38.7 billion.
Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said recent improvements in the credit market will help reverse the slide in foreign buyers. “Stock market gains and improving bank balance sheets will permit a greater amount of lending for second home purchases,” he said. “In addition, expanding foreign economies for international buyers and favorable exchange rates give them more purchasing power, particularly in a period of record high affordability conditions in the United States. Property investment here generally builds wealth over the long term.”
U.S. laws do not restrict or scrutinize most property purchases by foreign nationals. There are few barriers to owning property here, unlike transactions in many other countries, although immigration laws prohibit foreigners from remaining in the U.S. continuously for more than six months without a special visa. In addition, international investors are afforded the same property rights as those enjoyed by U.S. citizens.
The top five countries of origin for foreign buyers were Canada, with 17.6 percent of buyers; the United Kingdom, 10.5 percent; Mexico, 9.8 percent; India, 8.5 percent; and China, 5.4 percent. The percentage of buyers from Canada, the U.K. and China declined from the previous study, while purchasers from Mexico and India increased.
Although most buyers were from North America, Europe and Asia, buyers from Latin America, Africa and Oceania also purchased U.S. real estate.
Foreign buyers were active in every state and the District of Columbia, with the most popular states being Florida, which accounted for 23.0 percent of all foreign purchases; California, 13.0 percent; Texas, 10.7 percent; and Arizona, 7.1 percent. These states are major gateways into the U.S. from other countries and also offer relatively mild climate.
California saw a notable rise in foreign interest as affordability conditions improved markedly in the state last year. “Florida is the most popular state for European and Latin American buyers, while Asian buyers are drawn to California,” Yun said.
The study shows 69 percent of international purchases were single-family homes, while condos accounted for 18 percent. Townhomes made up 8 percent of transactions, with commercial property at 4 percent. Nearly 46 percent of properties were in suburban areas and 25 percent in urban environments. The rest were evenly split between resorts and small towns or rural areas.
The prime purpose for purchasing a property in the U.S. is to use it for a vacation home, cited by 33.9 percent of respondents; for both investment and vacations, 23.5 percent; as a residential rental property for investment, 18.3 percent; and commercial property for investment, 3.5 percent.
The 2009 NAR Profile of International Home Buying Activity is based on responses from 3,785 Realtors® and describes international home buying activity in the U.S. over the 12-month period from the end of May 2008 to May 2009.
Saturday, September 19, 2009
HOME BUYERS WANT TO SAVE ENERGY - BUT ONLY AT THE RIGHT PRICE, NAHB SURVEY SHOWS
Even though prospective home buyers want the benefits of new, more efficient homes, they are unwilling to pay much more for a “green” home, according to a recent member survey from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB).
“Although we are seeing significant interest in green building, cost effectiveness is clearly a key concern among home buyers,” said NAHB Chairman Joe Robson, a home builder and developer in Tulsa, Okla. “Builders said that among buyers who are willing to pay more for green features, more than half -- 57 percent -- are unlikely to pay more than an additional two percent.”
The August survey coincides with news that the NAHB National Green Building Program continues to grow. More than 400 homes, developments and remodeling projects have been certified by the NAHB Research Center, which administers the program and trains and accredits local project verifiers. Of those projects, 43 have been certified to the National Green Building Standard, approved earlier this year by the American National Standards Institute.
Preferences for specific green building techniques are decidedly regional, with builders in the West reporting much more interest in water efficiency than builders in other areas. Interest in homes built with recycled materials is particularly high in the Northeast (the region where the fewest new homes are built) and low in the South (the region with the highest number of housing starts).
Only 11 percent of builders nationwide indicated that their customers ask about environmentally friendly features, according to the survey. “Fortunately, our members are increasingly taking the initiative to educate the home-buying public about the benefits of green construction,” Robson said.
Overall, energy efficiency continues to be the primary factor driving the green building movement, squaring with previous NAHB surveys of home builders when asked about buyer preferences. “More and more, our members are able to convince their clients of the benefits of a home built with efficiency and sustainability in mind,” Robson said.
“However, when buyers prepare to sign on the dotted line, cost-effectiveness clearly drives their decisions. We need to make sure that our energy policies reflect that reality so that builders have the flexibility to use lot and site design, high-efficiency heating and cooling equipment and other features to achieve the desired results at the right price,” he continued.
“Whenever Congress considers how to encourage more energy-efficient construction, it must keep affordability in mind – and look for ways to incentivize these changes not only in new homes, but even more importantly in the nation’s much more substantial and inefficient existing housing stock,” Robson said.
“Although we are seeing significant interest in green building, cost effectiveness is clearly a key concern among home buyers,” said NAHB Chairman Joe Robson, a home builder and developer in Tulsa, Okla. “Builders said that among buyers who are willing to pay more for green features, more than half -- 57 percent -- are unlikely to pay more than an additional two percent.”
The August survey coincides with news that the NAHB National Green Building Program continues to grow. More than 400 homes, developments and remodeling projects have been certified by the NAHB Research Center, which administers the program and trains and accredits local project verifiers. Of those projects, 43 have been certified to the National Green Building Standard, approved earlier this year by the American National Standards Institute.
Preferences for specific green building techniques are decidedly regional, with builders in the West reporting much more interest in water efficiency than builders in other areas. Interest in homes built with recycled materials is particularly high in the Northeast (the region where the fewest new homes are built) and low in the South (the region with the highest number of housing starts).
Only 11 percent of builders nationwide indicated that their customers ask about environmentally friendly features, according to the survey. “Fortunately, our members are increasingly taking the initiative to educate the home-buying public about the benefits of green construction,” Robson said.
Overall, energy efficiency continues to be the primary factor driving the green building movement, squaring with previous NAHB surveys of home builders when asked about buyer preferences. “More and more, our members are able to convince their clients of the benefits of a home built with efficiency and sustainability in mind,” Robson said.
“However, when buyers prepare to sign on the dotted line, cost-effectiveness clearly drives their decisions. We need to make sure that our energy policies reflect that reality so that builders have the flexibility to use lot and site design, high-efficiency heating and cooling equipment and other features to achieve the desired results at the right price,” he continued.
“Whenever Congress considers how to encourage more energy-efficient construction, it must keep affordability in mind – and look for ways to incentivize these changes not only in new homes, but even more importantly in the nation’s much more substantial and inefficient existing housing stock,” Robson said.
Friday, September 11, 2009
Lose Your Job, Keep Your Home - Ask for Help Before It's Too Late
MCT)-Few words sting like the ones that inform you that you’re being laid off — especially today, with jobs so hard to come by. If you’re a homeowner, the blow of a job loss can be even worse. In households with more than one wage earner, halving the monthly income can severely stretch a budget. And in households where there’s one breadwinner, having zero income can be devastating. A rainy day fund helps, but it’s important to craft a plan early about how you’re going to get through the rough patch. More people are facing this nightmare today: While the volume of subprime mortgages headed to foreclosure is falling, the volume of prime, fixed-rate mortgages defaulting is on the rise, according to statistics from the Mortgage Bankers Association. The MBA’s chief economist said that’s a result of rising unemployment.
“If you don’t have the prescribed three to six months income in the bank (now eight to 12 months due to how long it takes to replace that job), you’re really in deep trouble with some troubling decisions to make,” said Gail Cunningham, vice president of public relations for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling, in an e-mail. The NFCC is a national, nonprofit credit-counseling network. “We always advise people to pay their living expenses in full (this includes the house payment), followed by any secured debt (usually the car payment), and then the creditors. This will keep a roof over your head, food on the table, utilities paid, medicine in the cabinet, the kids at day care, etc. Once the money runs out, no one beneath that line gets paid. However, this assumes that there’s either some savings to fall back on or another income source,” she said.
Between programs offered by the government and loan servicers, there are additional options available for today’s homeowners before they slip into foreclosure — if they speak up and ask for help. Or maybe the best answer is to start over again by cutting your losses and selling your home or pursuing a short sale if you owe more on your mortgage than your home is worth, those in the industry say.
Whichever road you choose, it’s important to make contact with the lender or servicer as early as you know you could have a problem on your hands — and before you get behind on your payments. The MBA has a listing of contact information for lenders and servicers, including links to Web sites that give consumers a glimpse of some of the help that is offered.
“A lot of customers call us very late in the process, and it becomes extremely difficult for us to explain everything in one shot and to resolve everything to their satisfaction,” said Sanjiv Das, CEO of CitiMortgage.
Early communication is also stressed at Chase, said Christine Holevas, a bank spokeswoman. Remember also to be open and honest about your financial situation. You may think you’re bettering your chances for help by fudging on income information, for example, but it will in fact slow the process down; when income is verified and is found to be false, you’ll have to start over again, she said.
For help, there are counselors who will sit down with you and sort through options and paperwork. Chase, for example, has counselors at 27 homeownership centers throughout the country to assist its borrowers, Holevas said. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has a list of approved housing counselors, or homeowners can connect with a counselor through the NFCC site.
The solution that has gotten some of the most press this year has been the government’s Home Affordable Modification Program, which lowers monthly payments for borrowers based on debt-to-income ratios. Borrowers have to successfully complete a three-month trial period before the modification is finalized. Some homeowners are still confused about who is eligible, said Greg Hebner, president of MOS Group, a loss-mitigation service provider that works with lenders and servicers. For one, the program “requires a hardship, but does not require you to be delinquent,” Hebner said. “That is an important consumer misconception—if I’m still making my payments there is no help for me.”
But what the government does require is some amount of monthly income within the household, said Drew Kessler, director of sales for Rand Mortgage, in New City, N.Y. In a dual-income household, for example, if one person loses his or her job, a modification is a possibility. With one breadwinner, it probably isn’t. “There has to be some viable source of income,” Kessler said. “If they lost wages, or found a new job, the banks will work with them.” Kessler’s advice: It might be best to accept a job that pays less instead of holding out for one that is best suited to your salary history in order to qualify for the adjustment.
A borrower also has to be in danger of imminent default to be eligible, Holevas said. “They’re going to take a look at what your liquid assets are,” she said. If a borrower has more than seven months worth of payments in savings, he or she is not yet in imminent danger of falling behind and likely won’t be able to modify, she said. If you do qualify, it’s important to submit complete and accurate information in order for the application to move through the process without hiccups, Holevas added. If you don’t, “the back and forth tends to really slow things down,” she said.
Remember, if you don’t qualify for the government’s program, many mortgage servicers have their own modification plans, Holevas said. All options can be examined if you start early enough. “Contact your lender when you think you’re going to have a problem,” she said, even if you’re a couple of months out from not being able to make your payment.
For some homeowners, however, it might make more sense to sell their home and start fresh. Home sales are up recently in many markets, and if you’re living in a home that would be attractive to a first-time buyer eligible for the government’s first-time buyer tax credit, you might be able to take advantage and make a sale before the credit expires at the end of November, Kessler said.
“Maybe sell now and get yourself in a smaller property, a less costly property,” he said.
For homeowners who owe more on their mortgages than their homes are currently worth, short sales can be a viable option. In a short sale, the home is sold for less than the mortgage amount — with approval from the lender — and the difference is forgiven. Short sales usually take longer than a traditional sale, so borrowers might want to seek out a real-estate agent who is a certified default property expert in order to expedite the process, said Rich Rollins, president of National Quick Sale, a firm that works with the mortgage industry to get short-sale offers processed. His firm also helps match up investors with distressed properties, working out deals that allow the homeowners to give up ownership but rent their home, with the potential for them to “rent to re-own,” he said.
He warns, however, to be careful of unsolicited offers of help from people claiming they can save your home, he said.
“Be very wary of people who approach you for a profit or fee upfront,” Rollins said. “You’ve got to be diligent because there are people out there trying to steal your money,” he said. “You’re already in a precarious position. Don’t let people take advantage and take the money that you do have.”
“If you don’t have the prescribed three to six months income in the bank (now eight to 12 months due to how long it takes to replace that job), you’re really in deep trouble with some troubling decisions to make,” said Gail Cunningham, vice president of public relations for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling, in an e-mail. The NFCC is a national, nonprofit credit-counseling network. “We always advise people to pay their living expenses in full (this includes the house payment), followed by any secured debt (usually the car payment), and then the creditors. This will keep a roof over your head, food on the table, utilities paid, medicine in the cabinet, the kids at day care, etc. Once the money runs out, no one beneath that line gets paid. However, this assumes that there’s either some savings to fall back on or another income source,” she said.
Between programs offered by the government and loan servicers, there are additional options available for today’s homeowners before they slip into foreclosure — if they speak up and ask for help. Or maybe the best answer is to start over again by cutting your losses and selling your home or pursuing a short sale if you owe more on your mortgage than your home is worth, those in the industry say.
Whichever road you choose, it’s important to make contact with the lender or servicer as early as you know you could have a problem on your hands — and before you get behind on your payments. The MBA has a listing of contact information for lenders and servicers, including links to Web sites that give consumers a glimpse of some of the help that is offered.
“A lot of customers call us very late in the process, and it becomes extremely difficult for us to explain everything in one shot and to resolve everything to their satisfaction,” said Sanjiv Das, CEO of CitiMortgage.
Early communication is also stressed at Chase, said Christine Holevas, a bank spokeswoman. Remember also to be open and honest about your financial situation. You may think you’re bettering your chances for help by fudging on income information, for example, but it will in fact slow the process down; when income is verified and is found to be false, you’ll have to start over again, she said.
For help, there are counselors who will sit down with you and sort through options and paperwork. Chase, for example, has counselors at 27 homeownership centers throughout the country to assist its borrowers, Holevas said. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has a list of approved housing counselors, or homeowners can connect with a counselor through the NFCC site.
The solution that has gotten some of the most press this year has been the government’s Home Affordable Modification Program, which lowers monthly payments for borrowers based on debt-to-income ratios. Borrowers have to successfully complete a three-month trial period before the modification is finalized. Some homeowners are still confused about who is eligible, said Greg Hebner, president of MOS Group, a loss-mitigation service provider that works with lenders and servicers. For one, the program “requires a hardship, but does not require you to be delinquent,” Hebner said. “That is an important consumer misconception—if I’m still making my payments there is no help for me.”
But what the government does require is some amount of monthly income within the household, said Drew Kessler, director of sales for Rand Mortgage, in New City, N.Y. In a dual-income household, for example, if one person loses his or her job, a modification is a possibility. With one breadwinner, it probably isn’t. “There has to be some viable source of income,” Kessler said. “If they lost wages, or found a new job, the banks will work with them.” Kessler’s advice: It might be best to accept a job that pays less instead of holding out for one that is best suited to your salary history in order to qualify for the adjustment.
A borrower also has to be in danger of imminent default to be eligible, Holevas said. “They’re going to take a look at what your liquid assets are,” she said. If a borrower has more than seven months worth of payments in savings, he or she is not yet in imminent danger of falling behind and likely won’t be able to modify, she said. If you do qualify, it’s important to submit complete and accurate information in order for the application to move through the process without hiccups, Holevas added. If you don’t, “the back and forth tends to really slow things down,” she said.
Remember, if you don’t qualify for the government’s program, many mortgage servicers have their own modification plans, Holevas said. All options can be examined if you start early enough. “Contact your lender when you think you’re going to have a problem,” she said, even if you’re a couple of months out from not being able to make your payment.
For some homeowners, however, it might make more sense to sell their home and start fresh. Home sales are up recently in many markets, and if you’re living in a home that would be attractive to a first-time buyer eligible for the government’s first-time buyer tax credit, you might be able to take advantage and make a sale before the credit expires at the end of November, Kessler said.
“Maybe sell now and get yourself in a smaller property, a less costly property,” he said.
For homeowners who owe more on their mortgages than their homes are currently worth, short sales can be a viable option. In a short sale, the home is sold for less than the mortgage amount — with approval from the lender — and the difference is forgiven. Short sales usually take longer than a traditional sale, so borrowers might want to seek out a real-estate agent who is a certified default property expert in order to expedite the process, said Rich Rollins, president of National Quick Sale, a firm that works with the mortgage industry to get short-sale offers processed. His firm also helps match up investors with distressed properties, working out deals that allow the homeowners to give up ownership but rent their home, with the potential for them to “rent to re-own,” he said.
He warns, however, to be careful of unsolicited offers of help from people claiming they can save your home, he said.
“Be very wary of people who approach you for a profit or fee upfront,” Rollins said. “You’ve got to be diligent because there are people out there trying to steal your money,” he said. “You’re already in a precarious position. Don’t let people take advantage and take the money that you do have.”
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Pending Home Sales on a Roll, Up for Sixth Straight Month
Contract activity for pending home sales has risen for six straight months, a pattern not seen in the history of the index since it began in 2001, according to the National Association of Realtors®.
The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contracts signed in July, increased 3.2% to 97.6 from a reading of 94.6 in June, and is 12.0% higher than July 2008 when it was 87.1.The index is at the highest level since June 2007 when it was 100.7.
Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said the housing market momentum has clearly turned for the better. “The recovery is broad-based across many parts of the country. Housing affordability has been at record highs this year with the added stimulus of a first-time buyer tax credit,” he said. “Other buyers are taking advantage of low home values before prices turn higher. Nationally, the typical mortgage payment now takes less than 25% of a middle-income family’s monthly income to buy a median priced home, with payment percentages so far in 2009 being the lowest on record dating back to 1970. As long as home buyers stay within their budget, mortgage payments will be very manageable,” Yun said.
NAR estimates that about 1.8 to 2.0 million first-time buyers will take advantage of the $8,000 tax credit this year, with approximately 350,000 additional sales that would not have taken place without the credit. Buyers have little time to act because they must complete the transaction by November 30, 2009 to qualify for the credit. Unless extended, contracts signed but not completed by that date will not be eligible- it is taking approximately two months to complete home sales in the current market.
The Pending Home Sales Index in the Northeast declined 3.0% to 78.8 in July but is 4.7% higher than July 2008. In the Midwest the index slipped 2.0% to 88.1 but is 8.1% above a year ago. In the South, pending home sales activity rose 3.1% to an index of 103.8 in July and is 12.0% above July 2008. In the West the index jumped 12.1% to 112.5 and is 20.0% above a year ago.
NAR President Charles McMillan, a broker with Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage in Dallas-Fort Worth, said Congress needs to keep the momentum going. “Even with a good recovery taking place, the market is not yet back to normal. With a gradual absorption of inventory, we are on the cusp of a general stabilization in home prices,” he said. “To ensure that housing has a broad stimulus to the overall economy and stays on sound footing, we’re encouraging Congress to extend the tax credit into 2010, and to expand it to all buyers of primary residences. The faster we stabilize home prices, the fewer families will face foreclosure and the quicker credit can be extended to other sectors of the economy,” McMillan said.
NAR’s Housing Affordability Index (HAI) stood at 158.5 in July, below the peak set in April but is still 36.0 percentage points higher than a year ago. The HAI is a broad measure of housing affordability using consistent values and assumptions over time, which examines the relationship between home prices, mortgage interest rates and family income.
Yun expects existing-home sales to rise through the fourth quarter. “Unless the tax credit is extended, no one should be surprised to see home sales drop in the first quarter of next year,” he said. “However, the fundamentals of the housing market and the economy are trending up, and we expect home sales to generally pick up in the second quarter of 2010. The buyer psychology may be shifting from, ‘Why buy now when I can purchase later,’ to ‘I don’t want to miss out on a recovery.’”
The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contracts signed in July, increased 3.2% to 97.6 from a reading of 94.6 in June, and is 12.0% higher than July 2008 when it was 87.1.The index is at the highest level since June 2007 when it was 100.7.
Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said the housing market momentum has clearly turned for the better. “The recovery is broad-based across many parts of the country. Housing affordability has been at record highs this year with the added stimulus of a first-time buyer tax credit,” he said. “Other buyers are taking advantage of low home values before prices turn higher. Nationally, the typical mortgage payment now takes less than 25% of a middle-income family’s monthly income to buy a median priced home, with payment percentages so far in 2009 being the lowest on record dating back to 1970. As long as home buyers stay within their budget, mortgage payments will be very manageable,” Yun said.
NAR estimates that about 1.8 to 2.0 million first-time buyers will take advantage of the $8,000 tax credit this year, with approximately 350,000 additional sales that would not have taken place without the credit. Buyers have little time to act because they must complete the transaction by November 30, 2009 to qualify for the credit. Unless extended, contracts signed but not completed by that date will not be eligible- it is taking approximately two months to complete home sales in the current market.
The Pending Home Sales Index in the Northeast declined 3.0% to 78.8 in July but is 4.7% higher than July 2008. In the Midwest the index slipped 2.0% to 88.1 but is 8.1% above a year ago. In the South, pending home sales activity rose 3.1% to an index of 103.8 in July and is 12.0% above July 2008. In the West the index jumped 12.1% to 112.5 and is 20.0% above a year ago.
NAR President Charles McMillan, a broker with Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage in Dallas-Fort Worth, said Congress needs to keep the momentum going. “Even with a good recovery taking place, the market is not yet back to normal. With a gradual absorption of inventory, we are on the cusp of a general stabilization in home prices,” he said. “To ensure that housing has a broad stimulus to the overall economy and stays on sound footing, we’re encouraging Congress to extend the tax credit into 2010, and to expand it to all buyers of primary residences. The faster we stabilize home prices, the fewer families will face foreclosure and the quicker credit can be extended to other sectors of the economy,” McMillan said.
NAR’s Housing Affordability Index (HAI) stood at 158.5 in July, below the peak set in April but is still 36.0 percentage points higher than a year ago. The HAI is a broad measure of housing affordability using consistent values and assumptions over time, which examines the relationship between home prices, mortgage interest rates and family income.
Yun expects existing-home sales to rise through the fourth quarter. “Unless the tax credit is extended, no one should be surprised to see home sales drop in the first quarter of next year,” he said. “However, the fundamentals of the housing market and the economy are trending up, and we expect home sales to generally pick up in the second quarter of 2010. The buyer psychology may be shifting from, ‘Why buy now when I can purchase later,’ to ‘I don’t want to miss out on a recovery.’”
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Coldwell Banker Gender Survey
Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC recently surveyed 1,000 individuals to discover how much men and women differ in the home-buying process. Using a third-party research firm, International Communications Research (ICR), they used questions such as “How long did it take for you to know that the last home you purchased was right for you?” and “If you found the home of your dreams but had concerns about its security, would you still be interested?”
“The results were surprising,” said Diann Patton, the Coldwell Banker consumer real estate expert. “Not only did we uncover some of the inherent differences between men and women, but we also pinpointed a number of ways that the two genders are actually the same. For example, both men and women are increasingly concerned with having a space to work in their homes- something we would not have seen 40 years ago.” Patton continued, “We also found that feeling insecure about a home’s safety is a deal-breaker for most people, regardless of gender.”
As reported by RISMedia,
“Below are some key highlights from the Coldwell Banker Real Estate study:
Women may be inclined to make up their mind more quickly than men.-When asked how long it took before they knew their home was “right” for them, almost 70% of women had made up their mind the day they walked into the house, vs. 62% of men. Conversely, significantly more men needed two or more visits: (32% of men vs. 23% of women).
Women would rather live closer to their extended family than to their job.-55 percent of women find it more important to be closer to their extended family (those that do not live in their household) than to their job, compared to only 37% of men.
A home’s security is a deal-breaker for both men and women.-64 percent of women said that if they found the home of their dreams but had concerns about its security, they would no longer be interested. More than half of men agreed (51%).
Couples say that no one “wears the pants in the relationship” in terms of major financial decisions.-When asked who wears the pants in the relationship (when it comes to major financial decisions, such as purchasing a home), almost 70% of respondents living with their significant other said it’s actually mutual.-However, 23% think that they, themselves, wear the pants in the relationship, not their partner. More men than women said this (26% vs. 20%, respectively).
Men and women agree on how they would use a spare room, for the most part.When the respondents were asked how they would use an extra 12 x 12 room if it could be anything they wanted, men and women agreed on the top three most popular, and very practical, responses:
-Bedroom: 25%-Office/Study: 15%-Family Room / Den: 11%
However, men really do want a “Man Cave.”-Interestingly, out of the 8% who indicated they would turn that spare room into an entertainment center, it was a preponderance of men leading the charge. In fact, four times as many men as women said they would use the extra space for recreation / entertainment.”
According to Patton, “These results further validate how critical it is for couples to recognize each other’s differences and work together, from picking a neighborhood to how to use a spare room,” she said. “Online tools and the expertise of a real estate professional can be particularly helpful for couples, especially if they work together step-by-step along the way.”
Contact your local Coldwell Banker agent or office for expert real estate information.
“The results were surprising,” said Diann Patton, the Coldwell Banker consumer real estate expert. “Not only did we uncover some of the inherent differences between men and women, but we also pinpointed a number of ways that the two genders are actually the same. For example, both men and women are increasingly concerned with having a space to work in their homes- something we would not have seen 40 years ago.” Patton continued, “We also found that feeling insecure about a home’s safety is a deal-breaker for most people, regardless of gender.”
As reported by RISMedia,
“Below are some key highlights from the Coldwell Banker Real Estate study:
Women may be inclined to make up their mind more quickly than men.-When asked how long it took before they knew their home was “right” for them, almost 70% of women had made up their mind the day they walked into the house, vs. 62% of men. Conversely, significantly more men needed two or more visits: (32% of men vs. 23% of women).
Women would rather live closer to their extended family than to their job.-55 percent of women find it more important to be closer to their extended family (those that do not live in their household) than to their job, compared to only 37% of men.
A home’s security is a deal-breaker for both men and women.-64 percent of women said that if they found the home of their dreams but had concerns about its security, they would no longer be interested. More than half of men agreed (51%).
Couples say that no one “wears the pants in the relationship” in terms of major financial decisions.-When asked who wears the pants in the relationship (when it comes to major financial decisions, such as purchasing a home), almost 70% of respondents living with their significant other said it’s actually mutual.-However, 23% think that they, themselves, wear the pants in the relationship, not their partner. More men than women said this (26% vs. 20%, respectively).
Men and women agree on how they would use a spare room, for the most part.When the respondents were asked how they would use an extra 12 x 12 room if it could be anything they wanted, men and women agreed on the top three most popular, and very practical, responses:
-Bedroom: 25%-Office/Study: 15%-Family Room / Den: 11%
However, men really do want a “Man Cave.”-Interestingly, out of the 8% who indicated they would turn that spare room into an entertainment center, it was a preponderance of men leading the charge. In fact, four times as many men as women said they would use the extra space for recreation / entertainment.”
According to Patton, “These results further validate how critical it is for couples to recognize each other’s differences and work together, from picking a neighborhood to how to use a spare room,” she said. “Online tools and the expertise of a real estate professional can be particularly helpful for couples, especially if they work together step-by-step along the way.”
Contact your local Coldwell Banker agent or office for expert real estate information.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
